Harmony Hammond breaks the rules and changes the game

Sarasota Herald-Tribune
2 October 2020

The art game has many rules. Great artists like to break them. But to do that, you have to know what they are. That’s not so easy. Some of the unspoken rules are so deeply ingrained, artists and critics alike forget they exist.

Until an artist like Harmony Hammond comes along. “Harmony Hammond: Material floWitness” makes a case for her impact at Sarasota Art Museum of Ringling College, which has reopened after seven months. This retrospective originated at the Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum in Ridgefield, Connecticut, and was curated by Amy Smith-Stewart.

So who is Harmony Hammond? Until I saw this exhibit, the greatest artist I’d never heard of. Now I know better. 

Here’s the short version ...

This pioneering artist hit her stride in the 1970s. A chapter of artistic history that encouraged outlaws and rule-breakers, within certain tacit taboos. Different art movements flowed together like mighty rivers: Minimalism, Process Art and Feminist Art, to name a few. With the obvious exception of card-carrying feminists, male artists dominated most of these schools. (A very important unspoken rule.) That was especially true in the arena of abstract sculpture.

Back in the 1970s, the presuppositions were clear. The unspoken rules were chiseled in the minds of artists and art critics alike. Why say them out loud? It was pointless – and just plain rude. Everybody knew.

Abstract sculpture should be as sleek as an Ikea coffee table. The predominant aesthetic was severe, industrial, inorganic, mechanical, geometric, clean and sterile. Materials like steel, stone and glass. Abstract forms that Plato would love. (That’s what abstract sculpture means, isn’t it?) Shapes and masses of a mental realm, not the messy, dirty earth. Forms as pure as a mechanical drawing on a graph chart. No stories, nothing personal or touchy-feely. (That’s what scrapbooks are for.) Nothing of this world. 

214 
of 1346